to
Jin H. Robinson
The Rt. Struble R. Cardwell.
8 Inclosures.
No 134-
Received.
Contribution.
the demand for Military
the Colony, consequent upon
Porting proceedings in
Hongkong 1014-8
3. That the Revenue cannot
bear the Charge
85
4 That the Community is already sufficiently taxed
2
The first Argument has been defended.
It was never stated that the troops were maintained in Hongkong entirely for Colonial purposes, and the Duke of Newcastle was of opinion that it would be impossible to "carry out any plan" for making Colonies contribute to "their defence if Hongkong were excepted".
The second point has been
seriously entertained.
As
regards
the 3rd point - the insufficiency
of the Revenue to bear the Charge -
The
Duke's Despatch in June 1883 was of
this purport
opinion on
That Sir H Robinson's plea
on general grounds
was not
proven.
Estimated
At that time it was
to
Jin H. Robinson
The Rt. Struble R. Cardwell.
8 Inclosures.
No 134-
Received.
Contribution.
the demand for Military
the Colorry, consequent upon
Purorting proceedings in
Houshong 1014-8
3. That the Revenue canust
bear the Charge
85
4 That the Community is already sufficiente taxed
2
The pist Argarment has been die fernd J.
was never stated that the troops wen Goland in Hongkong Entirely for Colonial purposes, and the Duke of New earth was of opinion that it would be impossible to "carry out any plan " for making Colonies contribute to "their defence if Conghony were excepted
The second point has gearres
been seriousf Entertained.
As
regards
-
the 3 forint - the insufficenz
Wthe Resene to bear the Charge-
The
Ducks Opencath in June 1883 was of
Sherearth
opsin on
That Sie It Robinsons plea
outral score
was non
proven?
Eshmated
At that time it was
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.